Added on May 19, 2010
sherry
America , Arizona , Bill Clinton , Boutros , casual observer , CFR , Chuck Baldwin , coffee shops , Combat , D.C. , David Rockefeller , dining room tables , Economy , empire , George H. W. Bush , George W. Bush , Gideon Rachman , government , Henry Kissinger , jackboots , Mark , merriam webster online , merriam webster online dictionary , Mexico , part , point of the spear , Richard Gardner , Robert Pastor , shadow of a doubt , State , Tony Blair , United States , US , Walt Rostow , Walter Cronkite , War , Warren Christopher , Washington , webster online dictionary , World News , Zbigniew Brzezinski
by Chuck Baldwin
Posted on May 19, 2010
People all over America are discussing freedom’s future. In short, they are worried. In fact, many are actually talking about State secession. In coffee shops and cafes, and around dining room tables, millions of people are speaking favorably of states breaking away from the union. Not since the turn of the twentieth century have this many people thought (and spoken) this favorably about the prospect of a State (or group of states) exiting the union. In my mind, this is a good thing.
Even many of those who oppose the prospect of secession understand the increasing tyrannical nature of the current central government in Washington, D.C., and that something must be done about it.
The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines tyranny as “1: oppressive power . . . 2: a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler . . . 3: a rigorous condition imposed by some outside agency or force . . . 4: a tyrannical act.”
Even a casual observer would have to conclude that most of the actions proceeding forth from DC today match at least Webster’s 1st and 3rd definitions of tyranny. Besides, who would argue the advantage of the tyranny of an oligarchy over the tyranny of a monarchy? A tyranny of many cannot be distinguished from a tyranny of one in most cases–especially not by those poor souls who are at the point of the spear of Government’s cruelties.
Added on March 24, 2010
sm
Act , America , appomattox court house , appomattox court house virginia , army of northern virginia , Barack Obama , Chuck Baldwin , Concord , Court , D.C. , date , Doe , general robert e lee , George H. W. Bush , God , Gun Control , health care bill , health care reform , Henry Kissinger , House , I. Section , influence , intents and purposes , Johnson , Massachusetts , number , President Lyndon Baines , Right , robert e lee , State , supreme , Tony Blair , United States , US , Wade , Walter Cronkite , War , Washington
by Chuck Baldwin
Posted on Mar 24, 2010
hat tip: Chuck Baldwin Live

Passage of the so-called “health care reform” bill in the House of Representatives this past Sunday, March 21 (I won’t even address the inferred unconstitutionality of Congress doing business on the Lord’s Day. See Article. I. Section. 7. Paragraph. 2.) drove yet another stake into the heart of America. For all intents and purposes, it is the health of the United States that is in dire need of healing. In fact, the US has been on extended life-support for decades. With its condition being rendered critical, and absent major surgery, its days are numbered. The passage of this bill only serves to further weaken an already frail Constitution.
In fact, this one may prove to be the fatal blow. Lady Liberty may never recover.
The decision by Congress to socialize medicine in the US ranks among the most draconian, most egregious, most horrific actions ever taken by the central government in Washington, D.C. This bill rocks the principles of liberty and constitutional government to the core. It changes fundamental foundations; it repudiates historical principle. Oh! The same flag may fly on our flagpoles, the same monuments may grace our landscape, and the same National Anthem may be sung during our public ceremonies, but it is not the same America. The Congress of the United States has now officially turned America into a socialist state.
On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the health care bill into law, and as such, this date–along with March 21–joins a list of dates that have each inflicted unconstitutional, socialistic, and sometimes even tyrannical action against the States United and have, therefore, contributed to the destruction of a free America.