Climate Change, Socialized Medicine and Population Control
By Adam Murdock, MD
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
The quote above is from the book Ecoscience published in 1977. In this book is detailed a plan for a “planetary regime” that would regulate the global population. According to the authors, this regime would be empowered to create specific “compulsory population-control laws” in order to accomplish this aim.
What specific population-control laws did they have in mind? For starters, the authors propose that this regime should have the power to:
1. Compel inferior mothers to either give up their children or have abortions.
2. Sterilize the population through putting “sterilants” into their water and food supply. According the authors of Ecoscience this would be okay as long as “pets” or “livestock” are not harmed.
3. Forcibly implant a sterilizing capsule which would only be removed with “official permission.”
It is clear that the above methods will be successful at curtailing the population if implemented. There is just one problem: How will they convince the people to go along with the program? Their solution is to demonize people that have too many children as having irresponsible “resource-consumption patterns.” They, therefore, need to be compelled to behave more responsibly in order to save the planet and to spread the earth’s finite resources more equitably. An additional rationale is that since government already regulates marriage, why not family size?
Despite these rationales for population control, it is clear that many people are unlikely to be convinced. Therefore, how will such unpopular measures be enforced? In the end, the only way the authors foresee fulfilling their dream will be through the creation of a “planetary regime” and international “police force.”
I don’t know about you, but these proposals are beginning to sound to me like the sick vision of some early twentieth century eugenicist.
Who’s Afraid of The New World Order?
The Liberty Voice Transcript Service
Transcript of a speech given by Lord Christopher Monckton, former policy advisor to Margaret Thatcher, in which a dire warning is given to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty.
At Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it — because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes around the world like the European Union will rubber-stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it. I have read that treaty, and what it says is this: That a world government is going to be created.
The word government actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from countries of the west to third world countries in satisfaction of what is called coyly a climate debt, because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t and we’ve been screwing up the climate. We haven’t been screwing up the climate, but that’s the line. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement. How many of you think that the word election, or democracy, or vote, or ballot occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists piled out of the Berlin wall and into the environmental movement and took over Green Peace so that my friends who founded it, left within a year because they’d captured it. Now the apotheosis is at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Noble Peace Laureate; of course he’ll sign it.
The trouble is this. If that treaty is signed, your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution, and you can’t resile from that treaty unless you get the agreement of all the other states participating, because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out.
