Home » necessary and proper clause You are browsing entries tagged with “necessary and proper clause”

Sexually Dangerous Can Be Imprisoned Indefinitely

By Kevin Gosztola
Opednews.com


Flickr Photo by bobster855

A Supreme Court decision on Monday stated that federal official could hold people who are considered “sexually dangerous” indefinitely even if their prison terms have been served completely.

The idea of keeping sexually dangerous people off the streets is not a bad one until you think of the enforcement mechanisms. Who gets to decide who is sexually dangerous and who is it? Aren’t these the same people who go to work with politicians who themselves have committed sex crimes?

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion:

“The statute is a ‘necessary and proper’ means of exercising the federal authority that permits Congress to create federal criminal laws, to punish their violation, to imprison violators, to provide appropriately for those imprisoned and to maintain the security of those who are not imprisoned by who may be affected by the federal imprisonment of others.”

Justice Clarence Thomas dissented (not because he found indefinite detention to be a violation of one’s civil liberties but because he found it to be a violation of state’s rights):

May 19th, 2010 | Posted in Web-Only Content | Read More »

Recently Commented

  • RobertNroland: 16Feb.2013 The Nalliah Thayabharan portion of this article will not print. The North Franklin St. in...
  • RobertNroland: 16Feb2013 Liberty Voice, where are you ? I sent, mailed USPA, $check about a week ago, it just came...
  • Bob Marshall: I would like to see term limits placed on supreme court judges. States stand up and tell the federal...
  • Bob Marshall: Creating so many laws is a way of taking more money and freedom from the citizens. God knew how many...
  • Bob Marshall: Why do we have such a large out of control government? Why do we have a national debt so massive it can...